Automatic language translation
Our website uses an automatic service to translate our content into different languages. These translations should be used as a guide only. See our Accessibility page for further information.
CRIME – bail – where bail sought after conviction but before sentence – whether applicant will be sentenced to a imprisonment by fulltime detention – need to show special or exceptional circumstances – where non-parole period will probably not exceed time applicant has spent in custody on remand – special or exceptional circumstances shown
JD v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2022] NSWSC 911
CRIME – Appeal and review – Application for leave to appeal from interlocutory decision of Local Court under s 53(3)(b) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – where sentencing decision and bail variation application listed on same day before a Children’s Court Magistrate – where Magistrate made finding of failure to comply with a bail condition following sentencing decision – whether Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to make a failure to comply finding because no substantive proceedings were pending or otherwise – meaning of “bail decision” in the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) – consideration of appropriate form of relief – alternatively, whether Magistrate applied incorrect standard of proof in making a failure to comply finding
BAIL – release application – armed robbery – knife – s 22B – unacceptable risk – commission of further serious offence – bail refused
DPP v PH [2022] NSWSC 1245
CRIME – bail – detention application – application made following pleas of guilty and before sentencing – consideration of application of s 22B of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) to juvenile offender being dealt with at law – high threshold as to whether the offender will inevitably be sentenced to full-time imprisonment – where the objective seriousness of the offending is extremely grave – where there are strong subjective factors in mitigation – where youth and achievement of rehabilitation would be prominent features in sentencing – s 22B threshold not satisfied – where offender would also satisfy special circumstances threshold due to family circumstances – where no unacceptable risks if variation made – bail continued
CHILD WELFARE — Parens patriae — Very young infant (30 months) placed with plaintiffs for prior 15 months — interim parental responsibility allocated to Minister — Minister and Secretary pursue transition plan for permanent placement with paternal uncle — Plaintiffs’ application for joinder to Children’s Court proceedings opposed and dismissed — Plaintiffs essentially desire permanent placement of infant child — Urgent hearing — infant to be removed within days — Restraining order made
PRACTICE — Parens patriae — Amended Summons makes reference to an independent children's lawyer (ICL) who has represented the interests of child in the Children's Court — ICL not named as a party as such — Nonetheless served with notice of application
CHILD WELFARE — Parens patriae — Nature of care and protection jurisdiction — Exceptional nature of jurisdiction where proceedings in Children’s Court and appeal decision of Magistrate refusing joinder of applicant to proceedings — Analogous approach to circumstance where applicants also challenge substantively seek to challenge decisions of Minister and Secretary regarding placement and transition plans
CHILD WELFARE — Parens patriae — consideration of permanent placement principles in s 10A(3)(b) of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW)
In re a Child [2022] NSWSC 671
Family law and child welfare – Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) s 98(3) – application by paternal aunt for leave to appear in person in care proceedings – whether leave should be granted – approach to be taken to applications for the grant of leave – HELD – leave refused
Burton v Secretary, Department of Communities & Justice (formerly Family and Community Services) [2022] NSWCA 7
APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – challenge to interlocutory decision refusing summary dismissal of proceedings – where no issue of principle or general public importance – no injustice shown – costs – challenge to costs order where no ground of appeal directed at costs – no reasonably arguable error in exercise of costs discretion
CM v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2022] NSWCA 120
CHILD WELFARE – care and protection of children – appeal from Children’s Court – mother seeks judicial review of appointment of guardian ad litem for mother – whether error of law on face of record – whether record included reasons for appointing previous guardian ad litem – whether necessary to make order that mother be legally represented before appointing guardian ad litem – whether jurisdictional error – ss 98 and 101 of Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) considered
Harris (pseudonym) v Secretary, Department of Communities & Justice [2021] NSWCA 261
CIVIL PROCEDURE – Summary disposal – Dismissal of proceedings – Abuse of process – Where care proceedings on foot in the Children’s Court – Where applicant applied to Supreme Court for stay of care proceedings – Whether Supreme Court proceedings duplicated issues and relief sought in care proceedings – Where final orders now made in care proceedings – Where only relief sought on appeal was declaration that removal of children was unlawful due to defective warrant – Children’s Court unable to grant such relief but able to determine same question as part of ascertaining its own jurisdiction – Granting declaration would merely be an advisory opinion – Evidence suggests serious obstacles to impugning warrant – Leave to appeal refused
CHILD WELFARE – Statutory removal – Emergency removal – Care order – Warrants – Challenge in Supreme Court to validity of warrant for removal – Whether abuse of process – Duty of Children’s Court to ascertain its own jurisdiction
COSTS – Orders against non-parties – Personal costs orders against lawyers – Where counsel appeared on watching brief for child despite no substantial interest in outcome – Whether to disallow costs of child’s independent legal representative – Children joined of Court’s own motion – Representative able to provide explanation for why submitting appearance not filed – Costs not disallowed
Spinks v DPP [2021] NSWCCA 308
CRIME – appeal and review – appeal against sentence – failure to consider properly offender’s youth and prior good behaviour – offender 18 years of age at the time of offending – whether immaturity affected conduct
CRIME – appeal and review – procedural fairness – failure to fix period of recognizance when sentencing – offender to be present and sentenced in open court – element of sentence contained only in orders as entered on court record
CRIME – appeal and review – procedural fairness – offender’s evidence consistent with defence – evidence elicited by prosecutor – offender given choice to change plea or change evidence on oath – withdrawn evidence treated as affecting credit
CRIME – federal offences – drug importation offence – defence available if drugs not to be sold – evidence of predominant personal use – no evidence of intention to profit financially – factor in mitigation
SENTENCING – mitigating factors – youth of offender – effects of immaturity – addiction to drug – substance abuse disorder – whether offender had control of drug use – drug use commenced at younger age
DS v R; DM v R [2022] NSWCCA 156
CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – two juvenile offenders DM and DS – each convicted of murder and aggravated take and drive motor vehicle without consent of owner while owner present in vehicle in aggravation – DM also convicted of robbery with wounding while armed with an offensive weapon – wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – offences included on Form 1 – offences committed on the same night in Queanbeyan – murder involved robbery of service station and stabbing of attendant by one of the offenders – both offenders liable for constructive murder – DS culpable for foundational crime on the basis of extended joint criminal enterprise to commit robbery – each offender affected by dysfunctional background and mental health issues – moral culpability reduced – long sentences imposed – whether moral culpability of offender part of determination of objective seriousness of offence – rejected – sentencing judge erred in assessing objective seriousness of DS’s offences – sentencing judge addressed DS’s participation in DM’s offences as opposed to DS’s offences – sentencing judge erred in failing to give effect to finding of special circumstances – no error in consideration of DS’s youth – objective seriousness of DM’s offence of murder assessed as substantially above the mid–range – no error established – whether sentencing judge erred in consideration of DM’s youth – no error established – whether sentencing judge erred in describing murder as involving “gratuitous violence”, “cold blooded” – submission untenable – no error established – whether sentences imposed manifestly excessive – sentences well in excessive of the objective seriousness of each offence – parity – Bugmy considerations – leave to appeal granted – appeal allowed – applicants resentenced
CW v R [2022] NSWCCA 50
CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – reckless infliction of grievous bodily harm – victim a 9 week old infant – fractured ribs – “karate chop” – squeezing – additional assaults resulting in fractured wrist and bruising to face – multiple assaults – twenty year old ill equipped father – personal history of trauma, dysfunction and violence – psychologist’s report –– whether sentencing judge failed to assess moral culpability – whether failure to apply “Bugmy principles” – whether Judge erred in approach to youth and immaturity – ex tempore judgment on sentence
R v AR [2022] NSWCCA 5
SENTENCING – Penalties – Community Service Order – Whether conviction must be recorded
SENTENCING – Sentencing procedure – Correction of sentence – Whether error of law in sentence originally passed
SENTENCING – Sentencing procedure – Offence by child under 16 years – Where dealt with according to law – No discretion to refrain from entering conviction as required for Community Service Order
CHILDREN – Criminal Law – Youth Koori Court
Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) and Jamzie [2022] NSWChC 1
CHILDREN - Care and Protection – correct test for restoration – short term orders
Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) and Jacinta [2021] NSWChC 5
Consent to final orders, contradictor
Finn, Lincoln, Marina and Blake Hughes [2022] NSWChC 4
CHILDREN – Care and protection – application for supplementary Children's Court Clinic Report
Doli Incapax Paper by M. Johnston, R. Khalilzadeh
21 Jun 2023
We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of the land on which we work and we pay respect to the Elders, past, present and future.